Which case established that a Section 1983 lawsuit can be initiated whenever a constitutional right is violated?

The case that established that a Section 1983 lawsuit can be initiated whenever a constitutional right is violated is Monroe vs. Pape. This landmark decision from 1961 clarified that individuals could sue state officials for civil rights violations under this federal statute. The ruling emphasized that the statute was designed to provide a federal remedy to individuals whose constitutional rights had been infringed upon by state actors, thereby ensuring accountability for violations of civil rights.

In Monroe vs. Pape, the Supreme Court highlighted the importance of Section 1983 as a mechanism for enforcing constitutional protections against abuses by those in power, reinforcing the notion that state actions that infringe upon individual rights can be subject to federal scrutiny and legal redress. This case set a significant precedent for civil rights litigation, allowing individuals a pathway to seek justice in federal court when they believe their rights have been violated by state actors.

The other cases listed do not address the initiation of Section 1983 lawsuits in the same way. They pertain to different aspects of constitutional law and rights but do not primarily focus on Section 1983 as a remedy for constitutional violations.