Which of the following is NOT included in defining federal criminal liabilities?

The definition of federal criminal liabilities typically focuses on specific actions and intents that fall under federal law. Among these, deprivation of rights under the Constitution or federal law is a concern, but the concept of "deprivation of state rights" does not fit within the framework of federal criminal liabilities.

Federal criminal liability often addresses violations that have a broader impact, such as actions that threaten national integrity or individual rights recognized at the federal level. The other options relate to actions that either violate federal law directly or implicate the federal government’s interest in safeguarding civil rights, such as actions taken under color of law, which can involve police misconduct or other governmental abuses, and conspiracy to injure a citizen, which addresses unlawful collusion to harm another's federal rights.

In contrast, the term “state rights” signifies protections or privileges granted by state laws, rather than federal statutes. Therefore, defining federal criminal liabilities does not include the notion that someone can be held accountable for infringing upon rights specifically defined by state law. This distinction helps clarify why deprivation of state rights is not relevant to the context of federal liability.